Rishi Sunak’s national service plan: Is it “bold” or “bonkers?”
Rishi Sunak announced a pledge to make national service mandatory for all 18-year-olds if the Conservatives win the election.
Listen to this article
In Brief...
- Rishi Sunak has proposed mandatory national service for all 18-year-olds, involving either a military training scheme or community volunteering.
- The plan is controversial, with critics calling it desperate and unfunded, while supporters argue it fosters skills and a sense of purpose.
- The scheme's execution and enforcement details remain unclear, raising questions about its feasibility and impact.
What has Rishi Sunak announced?
Days after calling a general election for July 4th, Rishi Sunak announced a pledge to make national service mandatory for all 18-year-olds if the Conservatives win the election.
What does the plan involve?
Sunak’s plan means 18-year-olds will be compelled by law to complete national service, however it is not ‘national service’ in the sense you might be thinking. Home Secretary James Clevery told the BBC the scheme being proposed will not force anyone to do military training.
Instead, 18-year-olds will have to choose from one of the following two options:
1 - Military training scheme: There will be 30,000 “selective” places on a year-long full-time military training scheme. The scheme could see teenagers join departments including cyber security, logistics, procurement and more.
2 - Community volunteering: This involves spending one weekend every month volunteering with an organisation such as the NHS, search and rescue or volunteering with old people in the community. This would amount to 25 days of volunteering in total.
What if you don’t want to take part?
While 18-year-olds will have a choice in terms of which of the two routes they choose to go down, there will not be an option to opt out.
Cleverly has confirmed that no one will go to prison if they don’t take part (which is handy, as there’s no room anyway), but there will be non-criminal sanctions. The Conservatives haven’t said what those punishments would be.
There is talk that parents could be fined if their 18-year-old doesn’t participate, but the Conservatives themselves have not announced as such. And as 18-year-olds are adults, this.. well, it doesn’t seem likely. It may also be problematic if 18-year-olds themselves are fined, as you can imagine a world in which those from wealthy families will easily manage to evade the scheme, leaving only those without the means to pay the fine to serve. Again, the Tories have not said this is the case though.
In short, right now, how exactly the national service scheme will be made compulsory remains to be seen.
What are the arguments for the Conservatives national service scheme?
Let’s discuss the pros.
Sunak has argued that a national service will give young people new skills and opportunities whilst allowing them to “contribute to their community and country”. He also thinks it will give young people a “shared sense of purpose”.
"It is going to foster a culture of service which is going to be incredibly powerful for making our society more cohesive, and in a more uncertain and dangerous world it's going to strengthen our country's security and resilience."
What are the arguments against the Conservatives national service scheme?
The plans for national service are estimated to cost £2.5billion - a sum that many argue would be better spent on the NHS, housing or education amongst other things. Labour have criticised the pledge as “desperate,” “unfunded” and a “gimmick”.
As mentioned earlier, it also remains to be seen how this scheme would be executed. The fact that the Tories can’t say how exactly they will punish those who don’t take part in the mandatory service has left many questions unanswered.
What do The News Agents think?
After the announcement Jon Sopel and Lewis Goodall jumped on the mics to break down the scheme and share their analysis.
Jon Sopel’s take: “I think it's worth distinguishing between the audience that's on Twitter, which is deriving the proposals and kind of having great fun with it. And the audience that may be thinking, actually, it's not a bad idea and young people could do with a bit of this.”
“Is this the transformative idea that is going to change Conservative Party fortunes? Probably not. But it's an idea where people will be interested in it. Now the problem is still that it just hasn't been thought through.”
Lewis Goodall’s take: “The Conservative Party now is starting to remind me of kind of how Jeremy Corbyn was in the run up to the 2019 election, the Labour Party then probably cognizant of knowing that it's highly unlikely that you're going to be actually implementing any of this stuff. So we don't need to worry too much about the exact fine details.”
“In that circumstance, what do you do? Well, the only play you have is to try and at least close the gap with Labour via the most obvious route, which is the voters who are switching to Reform and they think and it does pull well with those voters… They sort of think it would be good for the rigour and discipline of young people if they did [national service], so I can see it as a political play, but in a way it's a political play born of significant weakness.”